How one unhealthy regulation drives hospital consolidation and excessive well being care prices

People are getting squeezed by rising well being care prices. The most recent numbers from the Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid Providers present that affected person out-of-pocket spending elevated by 10.4% in 2021, a price not seen for greater than three a long time. The price of month-to-month medical insurance premiums additionally leapt, by 6.5%. And that was all earlier than final yr’s speedy inflation squeezed family budgets.

One usually ignored explanation for hovering well being care prices is hospital consolidation. When a single well being care system turns into the one sport on the town, it successfully turns right into a monopoly and may set costs at no matter degree it likes. Even only a few acquisitions of smaller clinics by a big hospital permits all of them to lift charges. Sufferers are pressured to pay extra for care, or journey farther afield, which will also be costly.

Many hospital acquisitions as of late are pushed by a single well-intended however poorly written coverage, the 340B Drug Pricing Program, which grew to become regulation in 1992 and expanded in 2003. The objective was to assist low-income sufferers get entry to medication and enhance their well being. As a substitute, 340B has was a money seize for wily operators gaming the system.

This system requires drugmakers to present important reductions to well being care services that serve a excessive variety of low-income and uninsured sufferers. The hospitals and clinics that qualify can sometimes buy medication at 25% to 50% off. In idea, the financial savings ought to go to assist struggling sufferers. However this system has a number of deadly flaws.

As a examine within the New England Journal of Medication noticed, this system doesn’t require hospitals to make use of their 340B financial savings to enhance look after underserved sufferers and imposes solely minimal oversight as to whether or not they’re supporting that mission in any respect.

It actually doesn’t appear to be serving to. Because the authors of the examine notice, “monetary positive aspects for hospitals haven’t been related to clear proof of expanded care or decrease mortality amongst low-income sufferers.”

Whereas it’s clearly not fulfilling its meant function, the 340B program is driving up well being care prices by incentivizing hospital mergers. Because the regulation is written, a hospital can get these up-to-half-off reductions at any facility it operates, together with satellite tv for pc clinics. And the reductions strengthen incentives for hospitals to resell medication to middle-class and well-off sufferers who’ve beneficiant insurance coverage protection.

All this has inspired acquisitions to the purpose that now, the ten largest well being care programs in the USA management practically one-quarter of all hospitals. In brief, giant hospital programs are exploiting the regulation to brush ever-larger swaths of the well being care system into 340B, together with services in prosperous areas. The variety of hospitals and clinics enrolled in this system elevated by an astonishing 517% from 2000 to 2020. Hospital revenue is up accordingly: From 2013 to 2018, the ten largest well being programs noticed complete affected person income improve 82%, from $505 billion to $918 billion, in accordance with analysis from Deloitte Insights.

However whereas hospital conglomerates get wealthy off of 340B, the neediest sufferers see no profit, and consolidation continues to push well being care spending larger.

The one answer is for Congress to revise the regulation, enacting safeguards that return 340B to its meant function.

A superb place to start out could be cracking down on eligibility. Program entry ought to be restricted to well being care services that really serve low-income sufferers. Subsequent, 340B hospitals ought to have to make use of their reductions to learn the goal inhabitants and doc how they’re doing so.

Till politicians overhaul the regulation, we’ll all proceed to pay.

Sally C. Pipes is the chief government and Thomas W. Smith Fellow in Well being Care Coverage on the Pacific Analysis Institute. Her newest guide is “False Premise, False Promise: The Disastrous Actuality of Medicare for All.” She wrote this for The Dallas Morning Information.

We welcome your ideas in a letter to the editor. See the rules and submit your letter right here.